CAPITULUM XXIV – GRAMMATICA
I.
Pronouns – Review of personal pronouns – chart
singular |
plural |
first person |
|
ego |
nōs |
mē |
nōs |
mihi |
nōbīs |
(ā)
mē |
(ā)
nōbis |
second person |
|
tū |
vōs |
tē |
vōs |
tibi |
vōbīs |
(ā)
tē |
(ā)
vōbīs |
third person |
|
-- |
-- |
sē |
sē |
sibi |
sibi |
(ā)
sē |
(ā)
sē |
II.
Pluperfect Tense – tempus plūsquamperfectum – uses and forms.
A.
This tense denotes an action or
state of being that came before some point in the past, i.e., that something had
taken place before something else took place, or that something took
place in the past because something else had taken place before that.
B.
Examples (from the Grammatica):
1.
Puer ūmidus erat quod per
imbrem ambulāverat – the
boy was wet because he had walked
through the rain.
2.
Herī magister puerum laudāvit,
quia bonus discipulus fuerat: bene
recitāverat et scrīpserat, magistrō pāruerat, nec in ludō dormīverat.
Yesterday the teacher praised the boy, because he had been a good student: he had recited and written well, had obeyed the teacher, and had not slept in school.
3.
Mārcus ā patre suō
nōn verberātus est, quia in ludō iam bis ā magistrō
verberātus erat – Marcus
was not beaten by his father, because in school he had already been beaten
twice by his teacher.
C.
Formation:
1.
Active – add the
imperfect of sum (eram, erās, erat, erāmus, erātis,
erant) directly to the perfect stem (found by taking the –isse off the perfect active
infinitive).
2.
Passive – use the
imperfect of sum (eram, erās, erat, erāmus, erātis,
erant) as an auxiliary verb with the perfect passive participle (the supine
with first and second declension adjective endings), subject like any adjective
to the rule of agreement in number, case and gender with the noun it modifies
(in this construction that would of course be the subject - whether nominative
or, if in indirect discourse, accusative).
III.
Deponent Verbs – participles; perfect tense; singular imperative
A.
This kind of verb is always
passive in form, except for the present participle and the future
participle. Those are formed
regularly and have active meanings.
B.
E.g. present participles: conāns, conāntis = trying; patiēns, patientis =
experiencing/suffering; future active participles: conātūrus = about to try; passūrus = about to suffer/experience
C.
As a corollary, you can note
that the first periphrastic is available for deponent verbs, with the result
that you could say conātūrus
sum as an alternative to conābor,
or passūrus est for patiētur.
D.
The perfect tense is formed
with what would be the supine if deponents had them.
1.
This is just like the perfect
passive of regular verbs, which uses the perfect participle with the forms sum, es, est, sumus, estis, & sunt as auxiliary verbs. Remember that it is the nature of
deponent verbs not to have any active forms in the perfect tense.
2.
E.g., Quīntus surgere conātur becomes in the perfect tense Quīntus surgere conātus est. Mārcus
mentītur becomes Mārcus
mentītus est.
3.
Note that these are active in
meaning.
E.
Though more fully treated in
Chp. 25, we get in this chapter a brief introduction to the singular imperative
of deponents. Quintus dīcit
ad versum 40-1: Cōnsōlāre
mē, Syra! Cōnsīde hīc
iūxtā lectum et loquere mēcum! (Cheer me up, Syra! Sit here next to the bed and chat with me!)
1.
An easy way to think of the
singular imperative of deponents is to imagine they have a regular active
infinitive. That is the imperative
singular form.
2.
If cōnsōlārī were the passive infinitive of a
regular verb – instead of being a deponent – its infinitive would
be cōnsōlāre. This was used as its imperative
singular form.
3.
Same thing with the third
conjugation deponent verb loquī. Its imperative is loquere.
4.
Again remember that these are
active in meaning.
IV.
Ablative of comparison
A.
Instead of using the adverbial
conjunction quam, the second term of
the comparison can simply be made in the ablative case.
B.
Examples:
1.
Mārcus pigrior est quam Quīntus = Mārcus prigrior Quīntō
est.
2.
...pēs dexter māior est pede laevō (line
30) = pēs dexter māior est quam
pes laevus
3.
...is nōn pēior fuerat cēterīs (line 77) = is nōn pēior
fuerat quam cēterī
4.
Is canis lupō ferōcior est (line
90) = is canis est ferōcior quam
lupus
5.
Melior sum frātre meō (line 108) = melior sum quam frāter meus
V.
Miscellaneous
A.
nōscere = get to know/learn; therefore, its perfect tense
[inf. = nōvisse] = know/be
acquainted with
1.
e.g. (lines 57-8) the question
of Quintus: Quōmodō Mēdus
puellam Rōmānam nōscere potuit? (How could Medus get to know
a Roman girl?) can be answered by Syra: Nesciō
quōmodō, sed certō sciō eum aliquam fēminam nōvisse.
(I do not know how, but I know for sure that he is acquainted with some
woman)
B.
Note we have a bunch of adverbs
with the –ō ending in this
chapter: prīmō (at first), certō (certainly), subitō (suddenly), dēnuō (again), continuō (right away, immediately)